Skip to main content

Table 5 Predictions and field observations of potential size of rhenium mineralization in porphyry copper–molybdenum and Skarn tungsten–molybdenum systems

From: Experimental determination of the hydrothermal solubility of ReS2 and the Re–ReO2 buffer assemblage and transport of rhenium under supercritical conditions

Predictions and field observations

T/°C

Solubility controlling phase

log

log

pH

log aCl-

Log aΣ S

Transportable re assuming saturation with solid phase in grams

Remarks and references for thermodynamic parameters

This study

400 to 500

ReS2

-26.9 to -21.6

-7.6 to -4.8

5.0, KMQ to 5.2, KMQ

-1.5 to -2.3

-1. 2 to 0

Typical porphyry Cu–Mo systems: ~2 × 108 to ~6 × 108 (~2 × 1010 to ~6 × 1010 for giant porphyry Cu–Mo systems)

Skarn W–Mo systems: ~4 × 107 to ~1.2 × 108

Log , log and log aΣ S are calculated from MPP bufferd

Porphyry copper–molybdenum

350 to 550

Solid solution of ReS2 and MoS2

-26.5 to -16.5a

PP bufferb

KMQ bufferc

-1.0

-1.0

~4 × 1010 (El Teniente, giant porphyry Cu–Mo)

ref. 40

        

~8 × 106 (La Disputada, typical porphyry Cu–Mo)

 

Skarn tungsten–molybdenum system

400 to 650

Solid solution of ReS2 and MoS2

-24.1 to -22.1

-8.2 to -6.25

KMQ and WQ bufferse

0.17 to >1.4 (log mNaCl)f

~-0.4g

~4 × 107

ref. 32

  1. aMagnetite–hematite buffer. bPP: pyrite–pyrrhotite buffer. cKMQ: K–feldsparmuscovite–quartz buffer. dMPP: magnetite–pyrite–pyrrhotite buffer. eWQ: wollastonite–quartz buffer, which should buffer pH values in near-neutral range as mentioned in the text. fConverted from salinity ranging from >60 wt% NaCl eq. to ~8 wt% NaCl eq. gAs log mFeso4, King Island.