Skip to main content

Table 1 Method II applied to selected natural waters

From: Activity of zero-valent sulfur in sulfidic natural waters

Sample

Ref.

ΣS-II(mM)

ΣS0(mM)

I (mM)

T (°C)

pH

HS−(mM)

aS0

Enghien-les-Bains, ER2

[79]

1.13

1.65

10

14

7.42

0.53

2.14

Puzzichello K22

[72]

1.64

0.165

21

14.5

6.9

0.633

1.57

Lower Mystic Lake (Ave of deep water)

[32]

7.1

0.33

400

8

6.80

2.30

1.37

Lake Croche +3.5 cm† above sed. surface

[80]

0.0081

0.0010

10*

5*

5.67

0.00019

1.42

Lake Croche −0.5 cm† below sed. surface

[80]

0.011

0.0045

10*

5*

5.96

0.00050

1.71

Lake Croche −3.5 cm† below sed. surface

[80]

0.0037

0.0007

10*

5*

6.05

0.00020

1.36

Great Marsh SU-82, 10–14 cm below sed. surface

[81]

2.15

0.22

1170

15*

7.02

1.08

1.26

Great Marsh SU-82, 50–54 cm below sed. surface

[81]

5.46

0.33

810

15*

7.17

3.26

0.98

Prairie Pot Hole P1 pore water; April

[36]

2.37

0.079

480

15*

8.62

2.29

0.30

Prairie Pot Hole P1 pore water; Sept

[36]

1.95

0.079

480

15*

7.36

1.36

0.77

Mahoney Lake deepest water column, 14 m

[82],[83]

27

0.29

600

14

7.30

18.0

0.58

  1. *When I or T were not reported, estimated values were used. †DOC = 10 mg/L assumed.