Skip to main content

Table 1 Method II applied to selected natural waters

From: Activity of zero-valent sulfur in sulfidic natural waters

Sample Ref. ΣS-II(mM) ΣS0(mM) I (mM) T (°C) pH HS−(mM) aS0
Enghien-les-Bains, ER2 [79] 1.13 1.65 10 14 7.42 0.53 2.14
Puzzichello K22 [72] 1.64 0.165 21 14.5 6.9 0.633 1.57
Lower Mystic Lake (Ave of deep water) [32] 7.1 0.33 400 8 6.80 2.30 1.37
Lake Croche +3.5 cm† above sed. surface [80] 0.0081 0.0010 10* 5* 5.67 0.00019 1.42
Lake Croche −0.5 cm† below sed. surface [80] 0.011 0.0045 10* 5* 5.96 0.00050 1.71
Lake Croche −3.5 cm† below sed. surface [80] 0.0037 0.0007 10* 5* 6.05 0.00020 1.36
Great Marsh SU-82, 10–14 cm below sed. surface [81] 2.15 0.22 1170 15* 7.02 1.08 1.26
Great Marsh SU-82, 50–54 cm below sed. surface [81] 5.46 0.33 810 15* 7.17 3.26 0.98
Prairie Pot Hole P1 pore water; April [36] 2.37 0.079 480 15* 8.62 2.29 0.30
Prairie Pot Hole P1 pore water; Sept [36] 1.95 0.079 480 15* 7.36 1.36 0.77
Mahoney Lake deepest water column, 14 m [82],[83] 27 0.29 600 14 7.30 18.0 0.58
  1. *When I or T were not reported, estimated values were used. †DOC = 10 mg/L assumed.
Back to article page

Geochemical Transactions

ISSN: 1467-4866

Contact us