Skip to main content

Advertisement

TableĀ 1 Sample-wise results of LiBO2 fusion and ICP-MS analysis of Marcellus Shale samples

From: Rare earth element geochemistry of outcrop and core samples from the Marcellus Shale

Sample name Sc Y La Ce Pr Nd Sm Eu Gd Tb Dy Ho Er Tm Yb Lu
Bedford, PA 7.37 22.5 15.3 30.8 4.14 16.2 3.74 0.81 4.50 0.65 3.67 0.86 2.53 0.34 2.3 0.32
Canoga, NY (OCM)a 13.0 33.2 26.4 44.2 6.54 26.1 5.99 1.31 6.49 0.97 5.02 1.21 3.48 0.52 3.22 0.47
Canoga, NY (OCM)a 12.3 33.6 26.5 42.5 6.44 26.1 5.71 1.22 6.96 0.93 4.83 1.20 3.47 0.48 3.04 0.48
1-DGLS 6.51 29.5 19.0 34.4 4.89 20.0 4.88 1.07 5.16 0.82 4.77 1.20 3.51 0.52 3.52 0.54
Petersburg, WV (N) 12.6 27.0 32.2 65.4 7.90 31.8 6.23 1.27 5.89 0.83 4.47 1.06 2.90 0.42 2.73 0.42
C-7789 19.1 18.3 28.7 61.2 7.14 26.6 4.99 1.13 4.46 0.66 3.34 0.81 2.30 0.35 2.33 0.36
Whip Gap, WV 5.42 11.3 12.7 21.1 2.75 9.65 1.88 0.41 1.83 0.28 1.66 0.41 1.16 0.19 1.25 0.17
Burlington, WV (1) 21.2 27.8 44.7 97.0 11.0 42.2 7.83 1.60 6.38 0.91 4.95 1.11 3.39 0.51 3.12 0.46
Canoga, NY (USM) 17.2 32.6 38.4 75.6 9.17 33.4 6.55 1.48 6.62 0.97 5.08 1.20 3.51 0.49 3.15 0.44
C-7838 22.7 30.5 38.6 75.9 9.08 34.8 6.82 1.46 6.25 0.93 4.93 1.20 3.60 0.52 3.32 0.50
Petersburg, WV (W) 23.0 30.6 45.5 96.5 11.2 40.3 7.86 1.62 6.62 1.00 5.23 1.26 3.53 0.53 3.51 0.52
C-7907 10.8 15.4 37.1 53.0 5.90 19.3 3.21 0.64 2.90 0.40 2.34 0.58 1.81 0.27 1.81 0.29
C-7801b 22.7 29.2 39.6 81.6 10.0 37.5 7.95 1.53 7.01 1.04 5.25 1.24 3.69 0.54 3.39 0.49
C-7801b 22.5 31.3 39.5 81.9 9.88 38.4 8.14 1.54 7.05 1.04 5.17 1.22 3.54 0.54 3.47 0.50
Le Roy, NY 20.2 36.6 35.4 73.4 9.26 36.2 7.99 1.77 7.81 1.19 6.13 1.45 4.23 0.62 4.35 0.61
Marcellus, NY 20.9 33.6 42.5 88.7 10.3 39.3 7.80 1.64 7.19 1.05 5.51 1.33 3.91 0.53 3.49 0.54
Burlington, WV (2) 4.37 24.0 18.2 32.5 4.28 18.4 3.92 1.18 4.70 0.64 3.31 0.78 2.08 0.29 1.68 0.27
C-7813 23.1 27.3 40.4 79.5 9.52 34.8 6.82 1.33 5.51 0.83 4.4 1.10 3.37 0.48 3.12 0.46
  1. All results are mass fractions, reported in parts per million (mg/kg) with three significant-digit precision. Average analytical uncertainty was 3.4% from 5 sweeps during analysis.
  2. a, bMethod duplicates.