Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of surface structure parameters for the (100) surface goethite + water between PBE96 AIMD and PBE96 + Grimme2 AIMD simulations of Fe24O60H48 + 53 H2O and fitted structure from CTR experiments of Ghose et al. [22]

From: Weakly bound water structure, bond valence saturation and water dynamics at the goethite (100) surface/aqueous interface: ab initio dynamical simulations

Surface structure parameters

PBE96 AIMD

PBE96 + Grimme2 AIMD

Exp. CTR model

R(Fe–OII)

~2.40

~2.34

2.152

σ(Fe–OII)

   

R(Fe–OI)

2.10

2.11

2.097

σ(Fe–OI)

0.08

0.08

 

R(Fe–Oi)

2.02

2.00

1.950

σ(Fe–Oi)

0.07

0.08

 

R(Fe–Oii)

1.94

1.97

1.966

σ(Fe–Oii)

0.06

0.07

 

∠OI–Fe–OII

80.2

81.1

81.25

σ ∠OI–Fe–OII

5.5

5.3

 

∠OII–Fe–Oi

87.7

87.7

82.85

σ ∠OII–Fe–Oi

5.8

5.7

 

∠OII–Fe–Oii

170.4

170.3

178.89

σ ∠OII–Fe–Oii

4.9

5.0

 

∠OI–Fe–Oi

81.8

82.6

80.85

σ ∠OI–Fe–Oi

3.6

3.4

 

∠OI–Fe–Oii

97.1

94.5

99.5

σ ∠OI–Fe–Oii

5.7

4.7

 

∠OIII–Fe–Oii

97.6

97.1

96.5

σ ∠OIII–Fe–Oii

4.8

4.3

 
  1. See Fig. 4c for definitions of OI, OII, Oi, and Oii oxygens (length unit: Ã…, angle unit: °)