Skip to main content

Table 2 Bulk soil chemical analysis and XAS linear combination fitting results for the second application of TPP

From: Chemical speciation and fate of tripolyphosphate after application to a calcareous soil

Label

Depth (m)

Soila pH

Total Elemental Concentrationsb

Ca:Mg ratio

Labilec extractable P (mg/kg soil)

LCF analysis resultsd,e

Reduced chi2

Ca (mg/kg soil)

Mg (mg/kg soil)

P (mg/kg soil)

Fe (mg/kg soil)

Adsorbed P (%)

Ca-P species (%)f

1b

1.82

7.8

22,800

15,200

820

24,700

1.5:1

74

10

96

0.00743

2b

3.66

7.8

29,900

17,300

870

27,300

1.7:1

79

24

76

0.00192

3b

1.82

7.8

24,800

14,100

790

25,000

1.8:1

71

18

81

0.00074

4b

3.66

7.4

23,900

15,900

880

29,600

1.5:1

60

41

61

0.00104

5b

1.82

7.9

22,200

13,800

750

25,200

1.6:1

85

43

57

0.00117

6b

3.04

7.9

1340

3140

3230

16,700

0.4:1

85

63

40

0.00139

7b

3.66

7.6

49,700

29,400

780

29,400

3.2:1

82

32

70

0.00140

8b

1.82

7.8

25,300

15,300

880

26,700

1.7:1

19

31

71

0.00130

9b

3.66

7.8

26,300

17,000

920

28,100

1.5:1

27

36

63

0.00155

10b

1.82

7.8

33,000

15,100

960

26,900

2.2:1

24

42

61

0.00059

11b

3.66

7.5

18,100

14,400

1000

39,200

1.2:1

62

31

70

0.00100

  1. aSoil pH accurate to ± 0.1
  2. bVia total XRF elemental analysis, concentrations are accurate to ± 10%
  3. cCombination of H2O and NaHCO3 extractable P
  4. dEo Shift constrained to zero
  5. e% Relative contribution to XAS signal; models are unconstrained and not equal to 100%
  6. fRelative sum of the contribution from calcium phosphate mineral species