Skip to main content

Table 1 Description, data and location of fifteen Kaibab Formation secondary (authigenic) silica samples extracted from the end-Permian chert rubble breccia (northern Arizona)

From: A geochemical view into continental palaeotemperatures of the end-Permian using oxygen and hydrogen isotope composition of secondary silica in chert rubble breccia: Kaibab Formation, Grand Canyon (USA)

δ18O SMOW (‰)a

δD SMOW (‰)a

Description and location of secondary silica samples

30.8

− 74.5

Drusy, vug-fill silica (Marble Canyon; KNB1)

30.6

− 70.0

Drusy, vug-fill silica (Soap Creek; SC2)

29.7

− 87.8

Translucent, microcystalline silica vug-fill (Badger Canyon; BC1)

30.8

− 77.6

Translucent drusy, vug-fill quartz (Marble Canyon; MC22)

29.9

− 76.1

White, translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Badger Canyon; KF1)

30.6

− 73.6

Translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Marble Canyon; K6)

30.99

− 78.0

White, translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Badger Canyon; KF2)

31.01

− 75.7

Translucent, dull botryoidal silica (Sevenmile Draw; K7)

28.52

− 86.2

Translucent, granular microcrystalline silica (Sevenmile Draw; K5)

31.5

− 77.0

White, translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Marble Canyon; NB1)

30.9

− 68.9

Translucent, granular microcrystalline silica (Soap Creek Canyon; SC3)

30.46

− 80.8

Translucent, dull botryoidal silica (Sevenmile Draw; 744)

28.9

− 82.0

White, translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Marble Canyon; NBK)

27.7

− 92.0

White, pale blue fibrous silica (Cathedral Wash; NB3)

27.8

− 87.42

White, translucent granular microcrystalline silica (Cathedral Wash; NB5)

  1. aReproducibility for δ18O is ± 0.2‰ and δD is ± 2‰. Reproducibility is based on duplicate runs and standards